while comparing the two reviews, the one from mike was a bit biased saying the film was like film-friendly film and he had contradicted himself again saying this it included scenes that’s were R rated. However the one from roger were more biased saying not how good the director and the film was, but the scenerys in the film that was a masterpiece recreation of the book‘s scene.
I think that film can give a lot of different feels compared to stage performances, I think that in film, you can hear the narrative speeches and you have a lot of different angles of camera, however, in stage performances, you can’t really feel that narrative in there, but, stage performances allows you to feel a type of realism that you can’t feel in film.
one of the most iconic scene in the film was the red dawn that I remember, the red dawn was written in the book but was not supposed to emphasize as a bloody scene in the book, however, the film had added it and made another layer on the existing amazing floors.
I like the film since the actors in the films actually made the film become more visually pleasing, their face movements have symbolized and showed the feelings of the character with realism. however, some of the scenes felt weird and slow, if it was me, I would change the phase/speed of the film to match to a same rate.
Comments